Pakistan’s digital finance story is usually told in glossy terms. Financial inclusion. Cashless convenience. Millions brought into the formal economy with a tap on a phone screen. JazzCash, with its massive user base and aggressively marketed microloans, sits at the center of that narrative, as per the grievance post of Irfan Baloch, Senior Human Resources Specialist at HRSG.
Shared in late December 2025, Baloch’s LinkedIn post struck a nerve across the platform. During a routine background check tied to a job offer, he discovered a Rs. 5,000 loan listed against his name in the Electronic Credit Information Bureau (eCIB). According to Baloch, he never applied for it, and he never received the money. There was no biometric verification, no consent, no warning. Yet the loan was real enough to stall his employment and quietly label him a defaulter.
To those unfamiliar, the State Bank of Pakistan’s Electronic Credit Information Bureau (eCIB) is a centralized database that collects and shares borrowers’ credit histories from financial institutions. It enables banks to assess creditworthiness, manage risks, and make informed, rapid lending decisions, while also recording inquiries.
Baloch’s post read:
Since 12 December 2025, I have:
- Contacted JazzCash multiple times via helpline and email
- Lodged several formal complaints
- Visited their customer centers on multiple occasions
- Continuously followed up with their support teams
Unfortunately, no resolution has been provided to date, nor has there been meaningful cooperation from the help center.
In a move that captures the desperation many victims describe, he even offered to pay the full amount plus markup, roughly Rs. 7,000, simply to clear his name. Not because he owed it, but because time mattered more than justice. The response, according to his account, never really came.
What makes the story unsettling is how familiar it sounds to thousands of others. Throughout 2024 and 2025, reports of unauthorized JazzCash microloans surfaced across Reddit, Facebook groups, app store reviews, and consumer forums. Users describe discovering loans they never requested, often during job applications, bank checks, or visa processes. Some trace the issue back to scam calls that tricked them into sharing OTPs. Others insist no interaction happened at all.
A common thread runs through nearly every account: once the loan appears on eCIB, the burden shifts entirely to the victim.
Investigations by Pakistani media outlets and data from law enforcement paint a worrying picture.
Across 2024 and 2025, similar accounts have surfaced on consumer forums, social media, and complaint platforms, describing unauthorized JazzCash loans appearing without warning.
One such case, shared in July, came from Syeda Kashmala, who reported receiving a call from what appeared to be an official JazzCash number. Immediately after the call, Rs. 5,000 was deducted from her wallet without consent. Moments later, a Rs. 2,500 loan was applied to her account, again without permission. She emphasized that she never shared her MPIN. Despite registering a complaint, she says JazzCash began deducting Rs. 125 weekly as a surcharge. Her requests to pause the charges until the fraud was resolved were denied. “It was my hard earned money,” she wrote, asking what recourse she had left.
Another case, shared in December by a user identifying as InspiringPineapple5855, illustrates how the issue can extend even to those without JazzCash accounts. According to the account, someone took a loan using their CNIC despite them having no Jazz number or wallet. The result was immediate blacklisting. Visits to Mobilink Microfinance Bank yielded little help. A brief helpline call revealed a phone number they claimed to have never seen before. Instructions were given too quickly to understand, and promised follow-up messages never arrived. Meanwhile, repayment options remained unclear, leaving the individual stuck between a debt they did not incur and a system unwilling to correct itself.
Taken together, these cases point to a pattern rather than isolated error. Pakistani media investigations and law enforcement data have documented a rise in mobile wallet fraud and CNIC misuse, with the FIA registering dozens of cases and arresting agents linked to unauthorized account activity. Experts point to a combination of leaked identity data, weak oversight of franchise operations, and internal loopholes that allow verification steps to be bypassed. While State Bank regulations mandate biometric authentication, enforcement appears inconsistent.
The mechanics are brutally efficient where a loan is requested, and funds move to a mule account. Markup also begins accumulating. The victim only learns about it when a third party checks their credit. Undoing the damage can take months. Many simply pay to make the problem disappear.
JazzCash has acknowledged rising scam activity and launched awareness campaigns alongside regulators. They even commented to Baloch’s post as:
Dear Irfan Baloch, as discussed with the JazzCash team, your issue has been escalated to the relevant team on a priority basis. We will update you as soon as a response is received.
To which Baloch replied as follows:
Sir, thank you very much for your response however, I have been hearing this sentence for past 3 weeks from your representatives on calls and via email. I request you to resolve the issue at your earliest.
This is the uncomfortable truth about digital lending at scale. Especially coming from JazzCash, with around 13 to 19.7 million monthly active users. Automation is excellent at approving loans in seconds. It is far less capable when something goes wrong. Dispute resolution remains manual, opaque, and painfully slow. A Rs. 5,000 loan should not be powerful enough to derail a career. Yet in Pakistan’s fintech ecosystem, it often is.
What we need is trust in digital finance, which cannot be built on speed alone. It is built on how institutions act when their systems fail. Right now, for many users, that silence of inaction is louder than any marketing campaign.
