4 min read
In the ever-evolving world of smartphones, Samsung has maintained its stronghold in the mid-range segment with its A-series. With the recent launch of the Galaxy A26 5G, comparisons with its predecessor, the Galaxy A25, have become inevitable. Both devices are positioned to offer exceptional value to users seeking a blend of performance, style, and affordability.
This blog presents a comprehensive, feature-based theoretical comparison of the two models and offers a well-informed conclusion to assist buyers in making an optimal choice.
Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Galaxy A26
Design
The distinctive separation between these devices emerges through their construction along with design elements. Noteworthy improvements on the Galaxy A26 5G include IP67-rated water-proofing combined with Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection which enables better durability for regular usage scenarios. The Galaxy A25 builds its body out of standard materials without IP certification since it does not offer the same degree of durability that challenging situations demand.
Display
Fueling smooth transitions on their screens the Galaxy A26 5G and A25 both offer 6.5-inch Super AMOLED panels running at 120Hz refresh rates. The Galaxy A25 performs better than the A26 when it comes to display brightness because it reaches 1030 nits but the A26 can only reach 771 nits. The height of 1030 nits on the display of the Galaxy A25 ensures better readability under bright outdoor conditions compared to other smartphone devices.
Performance and Software
The Galaxy A26 5G offers superior performance because it runs the Exynos 1380 processor which provides nearly 24% better capabilities compared to the Exynos 1280 processor in the A25. Users achieve better multitasking functions and get faster app startup times along with enhanced gaming experiences because of this performance boost. The A26 edges out the A25 regarding operating system software when it comes to both Android version 15 with One UI 7 and Android version 14 with One UI 6.
Battery Life
The devices share comparable battery life because they feature the same 5,000mAh capacity and 25W fast charging capabilities which result in prolonged day-long usage. Both devices maintain comparable power durations between each other although individual user routines and software updates can impact their battery performance levels.
Camera
The Galaxy A26 adopts dual front and back cameras that feature 50MP/main, 8MP/ultra-wide and 13MP/subject camera capacities alongside 2MP and 8MP lenses. Better image processing and 480 FPS slow-motion video capabilities provide the Galaxy A26 5G with an advantage but the A25 only supports 240 FPS.
Audio and Connectivity
The Galaxy A25 surpasses the Galaxy A26 5G for wired audio enthusiasts since it comes with dual stereo speakers along with an integrated 3.5mm headphone jack. The Galaxy A26 presents a single bottom-firing speaker besides removing its 3.5mm headphone jack to adjust with contemporary wireless technologies.
| Feature | Galaxy A26 5G | Galaxy A25 |
| Water/Dust Resistance | IP67 certified | No certification |
| Display | 6.5” Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 771 nits | 6.5” Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1030 nits |
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | Exynos 1280 |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Battery | 5,000mAh, 25W fast charging | 5,000mAh, 25W fast charging |
| Camera (Rear) | 50MP + 8MP + 2MP | 50MP + 8MP + 2MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 13MP |
| Slow-Motion Video | 480 FPS | 240 FPS |
| Speakers | Single bottom speaker | Dual stereo speakers |
| Headphone Jack | No | Yes |
Price
As of April 2025, the Samsung Galaxy A25 is priced at Rs. 98,500 in Pakistan for the 8GB RAM and 256GB storage variant. In comparison, the newer Galaxy A26 5G is available at a slightly higher price of Rs. 84,999 for the same 8GB RAM and 256GB storage configuration.
Both the Galaxy A26 5G presents itself as a more advanced and future-oriented device with notable enhancements in performance, durability, and software. Conversely, the Galaxy A25 remains a strong contender by offering practical features such as a brighter display and superior audio capabilities. The final choice depends on the user’s specific needs and preferences, with both devices delivering solid value within their respective segments.
